Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper organizes the embodied data ecosystem into a "pyramid" of five complementary sources, including real-robot data and simulation data, to address the challenges faced by embodied agents in learning from diverse data inputs. By analyzing how different data sources are selected and mixed during pretraining, the authors reveal critical insights into the relationship between data composition and the capabilities of various embodied foundation models. The study also identifies six significant open challenges that must be addressed to advance the field of embodied manipulation, emphasizing the need for scalable and aligned data-collection strategies.
The data pyramid framework reveals how the interplay of diverse data sources can unlock new capabilities in embodied agents, highlighting critical gaps in current methodologies.
Multimodal foundation models learned to see and to speak by consuming the whole internet. Embodied agents admit no such shortcut, since they require data that couple observations with physical states and actions. These signals can be provided, to varying degrees, by multiple data sources. In this work, we organize the embodied data ecosystem as a"pyramid"spanning five complementary sources: real-robot data, UMI-style data, egocentric and exocentric data, simulation data, and general vision-language data. We organize the pyramid around the tension between scalability and robot alignment, and further characterize each source in terms of data quality, diversity, reusability, and physical fidelity. We then analyze recent embodied foundation models through the lens of their data recipes, examining how different sources are selected, aligned, and mixed during pretraining. For embodied brain models, vision-language-action models, and world-action models alike, we relate data composition to capabilities in perception, reasoning, planning, action generation, and world prediction. We close by discussing six open challenges: building large-scale tactile datasets, collecting failure and recovery data, developing scalable data-collection pipelines, aligning actions across embodiments, leveraging egocentric data for dexterous manipulation, and designing principled data recipes for robot learning. We hope this work paves the foundation for the design of next-generation embodied systems.