Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper identifies and quantifies the problem of "over-editing" in LLM-based code repair, where models unnecessarily modify correct code. To address this, they introduce PRepair, a framework consisting of Self-Breaking (controlled bug injection) and Self-Repairing (edit-aware reward optimization). Experiments demonstrate that PRepair significantly improves repair precision (up to 31.4% in fix@1) and decoding throughput, showing promise for more targeted and efficient code repair.
LLMs' code fixes often break what wasn't broken, but a new training scheme that rewards minimal edits can boost repair precision by 31%.
Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong program repair performance but often suffer from over-editing, where excessive modifications overwrite correct code and hinder bug localization. We systematically quantify its impact and introduce precise repair task, which maximizes reuse of correct code while fixing only buggy parts. Building on this insight, we propose PRepair, a framework that mitigates over-editing and improves repair accuracy. PRepair has two components: Self-Breaking, which generates diverse buggy programs via controlled bug injection and min-max sampling, and Self-Repairing, which trains models with Edit-Aware Group Relative Policy Optimization (EA-GRPO) using an edit-aware reward to encourage minimal yet correct edits. Experiments show that PRepair improves repair precision by up to 31.4% under $\mathrm{fix}_1@1$, a metric that jointly considers repair correctness and extent, and significantly increases decoding throughput when combined with speculative editing, demonstrating its potential for precise and practical code repair.
