Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a comprehensive systems framework for establishing trustworthiness in embodied intelligence, emphasizing the need for sustained safe success beyond mere task completion. The authors delineate four interdependent layers鈥攎odel, system, evidence, and deployment鈥攖hat collectively ensure reliable task execution while managing risk across environmental variations. A novel hierarchy of trustworthiness levels is proposed, enabling graded assessments of deployment claims based on task capability, safety, and operational governance, which is crucial for advancing the field of embodied AI.
Trustworthiness in embodied intelligence isn't just about performance; it's about managing risk across a multi-layered framework that ensures safety and reliability in real-world applications.
Embodied intelligence integrates learned perception and decision making with real-time computation, control, and physical interaction. Because failures can cause immediate physical or operational harm, task completion alone does not establish trustworthiness. We define trustworthy embodied intelligence as the sustained capacity to execute specified tasks reliably under environmental and system variation while maintaining risk within acceptable bounds. We term this objective sustained safe success. Its supporting mechanisms are organized into four interdependent layers. The model layer generates task-competent action proposals with calibrated uncertainty and explicit safety preferences. The system layer realizes authorized actions dependably through integrated sensing, computation, control, hardware safeguards, fault containment, and fallback. The evidence layer substantiates bounded claims through evaluation, verification, validation, traceability, and structured assurance arguments. The deployment layer maintains claim validity through runtime monitoring, authority management, intervention, incident response, and controlled updates. Because assumptions and failures propagate across these layers, neither model capability, isolated safeguards, nor benchmark performance alone can establish end-to-end trustworthiness. Drawing on embodied AI, robotics, control, dependable computing, distributed systems, and autonomous driving, we further propose a non-normative hierarchy of trustworthiness levels. This hierarchy grades the strength of bounded deployment claims across task capability, safety, system assurance, operational governance, and supporting evidence, providing a basis for bounded deployment, comparative evaluation, research prioritization, and future standardization.