Track the frontier, from condensed matter to cosmology.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
RobotWorld is a new simulation testbed designed to evaluate multimodal agents' ability to translate instructions and observations into physical robot actions across 84 diverse tasks spanning manipulation, locomotion, and control. Analysis of agent performance reveals that while current models can construct complex perception and control workflows, they struggle with consistent task completion due to issues like object state loss and premature task termination. The benchmark also highlights embodiment-specific performance differences between models like Astra and Opus 5.5, providing empirical data on capability gaps for future agent development.
Current multimodal agents can build sophisticated perception-control pipelines but fail to reliably execute physical tasks, losing object states and mistaking unfinished goals for completion.
General-purpose agents increasingly write code, use tools, and complete complex digital tasks, raising the question of how far these capabilities carry into the physical world. To investigate this, we introduce RobotWorld, a challenging simulation testbed for robot use: turning instructions and observations into physical task execution through robot interfaces. Its 84 tasks span manipulation, mobile manipulation, locomotion, driving, and aerial control, with explicit interaction budgets and executable success checks. By analysing task outcomes alongside execution traces, we identify both the capabilities that transfer and the gaps that prevent reliable completion. Furthermore, we find that current agents can construct sophisticated perception and control workflows, including image segmentation, camera calibration, spatial estimation, and dynamics-based computation. These capabilities, however, do not consistently compose into successful behaviour: agents lose task-relevant object states despite reaching commanded poses, fail to correct ineffective actions, recover too late, or mistake unfinished tasks for completion. This uneven transfer also differs across models: Astra succeeds more often on spatial and constrained-contact goals, whereas Opus 5.5 succeeds more often on continuous-balance and timed-interaction goals. By linking these outcomes to execution behaviour, RobotWorld provides both a rigorous proving ground and an empirical account of the remaining capability gaps, thereby establishing concrete targets for training and designing more reliable physical-world agents.