Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces RuleMem, a novel rule-based memory framework designed to enhance long-term conversational agents by actively guiding evidence retrieval and reasoning through reusable logical rules. By constructing natural-language Horn clauses from dialogue histories and validating them with a Rule Perplexity Consistency (RPC) mechanism, RuleMem addresses the limitations of existing memory systems that treat past interactions as static facts. The framework demonstrated significant improvements in accuracy on two long-term conversational benchmarks, achieving a 54.3% relative increase over baseline models on the LoCoMo dataset.
RuleMem's innovative approach to active memory management leads to a staggering 54.3% improvement in conversational accuracy by transforming dialogue history into reusable logical rules.
Question answering agents in long-term conversations must reason over massive, temporally dispersed dialogue histories. However, existing memory mechanisms primarily treat past information as \textit{passively} stored facts, leading to semantic gaps and unreliable reasoning. To address this limitation, we propose RuleMem, a rule-based memory framework that induces reusable logical rules from historical interactions to \textit{actively} guide both evidence retrieval and reasoning. Specifically, RuleMem constructs natural-language Horn clauses from conversations and validates them via a Rule Perplexity Consistency (RPC) mechanism. These induced rules enable the retrieval of semantically distant evidence while providing an explicit logical structure for answer generation. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of RuleMem on two long-term conversational benchmarks, LoCoMo and LongMemEval_s*. In a rigorous comparison against 14 baselines on LoCoMo, RuleMem achieved the highest accuracy, exceeding the baseline average by 27.47 points (a 54.3% relative improvement).
Tsinghua AI