Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study evaluates the positioning accuracy of five commercial mobile robotic platforms for non-destructive evaluation (NDE) of aerospace structures using a laser tracker-based workflow. The results reveal significant variability in static positioning accuracy, with the KUKA KMP-1500 achieving a median accuracy of 8.2 mm, while the Boston Dynamics Spot platform reached 63.5 mm, highlighting the need for supplementary sensing to meet aerospace NDE tolerances. The findings provide a reproducible framework for selecting mobile platforms based on their localization capabilities and required calibration adjustments for precise NDE applications.
No mobile robotic platform currently meets the stringent aerospace NDE tolerances, necessitating substantial supplementary sensing for accurate deployment.
Mobile robotic platforms offer a flexible alternative to fixed manipulators for non-destructive evaluation (NDE) of large aerospace structures, but their base-positioning accuracy and how that accuracy should inform deployment have not been assessed under a common, externally referenced protocol. This work presents a laser tracker-based evaluation workflow (ground truth approximately 6 micrometers) that measures the static and segmented trajectory positioning accuracy of five commercial mobile platforms (KUKA KMP-1500, KUKA KMR, MiR250, Boston Dynamics Spot, Clearpath Husky) under a common protocol. A coupled multi-corner calibration recovers the laser-to-robot transformation and reflector offsets; ordinary least squares over all poses is used, with robust estimation retained only as a blunder check. Static positioning accuracy ranged from a median of 8.2 mm (KMP-1500) to 63.5 mm (Spot), with the wheel-odometry-only Husky uncalibratable. Dynamic path following was characterised by cross-track error; the component was insensitive to temporal alignment, which ranged from 6.9 mm (KMP-1500) to 112.1 mm (Spot). Both accuracy and calibratability tracked localisation capability, from the newest LiDAR SLAM platform to map-free visual odometry. No configuration meets the 0.2 to 1.0 mm aerospace NDE tolerance from the base alone; the results are framed as a design input that sizes the supplementary sensing each platform requires: roughly one order of magnitude for the best platform and nearly two for the worst, providing a reproducible basis for platform selection rather than a feasibility claim.
