Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper evaluates a novel runtime hazard monitoring approach for autonomous navigation that leverages the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker multipliers from a model-predictive controller to create a dual stress signal. By comparing this dual stress signal against a set of fifteen conventional geometric detectors, the authors find that it significantly enhances collision detection capabilities. The dual stress monitor flags 4.7 times more missed collisions than the geometric detectors, demonstrating its effectiveness in improving safety in navigation scenarios.
A dual stress signal can detect nearly five times more collision risks than traditional geometric hazard monitors in autonomous navigation.
Runtime hazard monitors for autonomous naviga- tion are conventionally built from geometric quantities: predicted clearance, time to collision, and required deceleration. A model-predictive controller that enforces safety through explicit con- straints computes, as a by-product of every control step, a second information channel that such monitors ignore: the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker multipliers of its constrained optimization, which measure the marginal control effort spent to maintain safety against each obstacle. This paper evaluates whether a horizon-weighted sum of those multipliers, a dual stress signal, provides a hazard monitor complementary to the geometric warnings the same state already supports. We compare it against a battery of fifteen geometric detectors tuned to a matched false-alarm budget, on preregistered held-out crossing scenarios driven through a physics simulator. The stress alarm actionably flags 4.7 times as many collisions missed by the entire geometric battery as the geometric battery flags in return (85 versus 18); combined, the two channels warn of three quarters of the collisions for which braking remained feasible, against under half for the geometric battery alone.
