Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Representation Distribution Matching (RDM), a novel paradigm for training one-step image generators by aligning generated and reference feature distributions using frozen pretrained encoders. Key findings reveal that the classical Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) can effectively serve as a scalable objective when estimated correctly, and that batch sizes exceeding 2048 significantly enhance generation quality. The improved RDM (iRDM) achieves state-of-the-art performance on ImageNet, outperforming previous models in both automated metrics and human preference evaluations.
A single representation can be easily manipulated, but a balanced ensemble of encoders dramatically enhances image generation quality and robustness.
We elucidate the design space of Representation Distribution Matching (RDM), our name for the paradigm that trains a one-step image generator by matching generated and reference feature distributions under frozen pretrained encoders. We identify two design axes, how the distributions are compared and the representations they are compared in, and controlled studies along them yield three findings. First, the classical MMD, which could not train convincing generators a decade ago, becomes a strong and scalable objective once estimated right. Second, the generated batch is then the operative variable, with an optimum above 2048, far beyond customary batch sizes. Third, any single representation can be gamed, driven below the real score while images stay visibly fake, so we match against a balanced battery of encoders and evaluate with SW_r14, a Sliced-Wasserstein distance over 14 encoders that is independent of the training loss and resists gaming. Combining the preferred choices yields improved RDM (iRDM): it sets the one-step state of the art on ImageNet at SW_r14 1.30, corroborated by PickScore, a human-preference proxy our objective never optimizes, which prefers it over the prior best one-step generator on 71.2% of matched samples. The same recipe post-trains the four-step FLUX.2 [klein] into a one-step generator, surpassing the four-step version on GenEval, 0.826 to 0.794, and on PickScore, 22.76 to 22.58, in 90 H200 GPU-hours. Project page: https://alan-lanfeng.github.io/rdm/.
