Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the Evidence-Grounded Video Question Answering Benchmark (EG-VQA), which addresses the gap between answer correctness and the grounding of predictions in relevant video evidence by providing a structured evaluation protocol with fine-grained temporal evidence annotations. The benchmark consists of 2,067 videos and 11,838 QA pairs, and introduces the Evidence-Grounded F1 (EG-F1) metric to measure both temporal alignment and semantic consistency of predicted evidence. Experimental results reveal that even advanced proprietary models struggle with evidence localization, highlighting the necessity of structured evidence supervision for improving video question answering systems, particularly in reasoning-intensive tasks.
Strong proprietary models falter in grounding their predictions, revealing a critical flaw in current VideoQA systems that could reshape evaluation standards.
Recent advances in Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs) have yielded promising performance on video question answering (VideoQA). Nevertheless, existing benchmarks are predominantly evaluated through answer correctness, while the grounding of predictions in relevant video evidence remains largely unexamined. This disconnect between answer generation and evidence understanding motivates the construction of the Evidence-Grounded Video Question Answering Benchmark (EG-VQA), an open-ended evaluation protocol in which each QA pair is explicitly annotated with supporting temporal evidence, thereby requiring joint reasoning and precise evidence localization. EG-VQA is comprised of 2,067 videos and 11,838 QA pairs with fine-grained evidence annotations. To evaluate predicted evidence, Evidence-Grounded F1 (EG-F1) is introduced as a unified metric in which temporal alignment and semantic consistency against ground-truth evidence are jointly measured. Experimental evaluation reveals that even strong proprietary models struggle to accurately ground their predictions, exposing a fundamental discrepancy between answer correctness and faithful evidence localization. To bridge this gap, EG-Reasoner, an evidence-grounded reasoning model trained with explicit supervision, is proposed. State-of-the-art performance is achieved among open-source models, with results competitive against proprietary systems, particularly pronounced gains are observed on reasoning-intensive tasks such as counterfactual questions. These findings demonstrate that scaling alone is insufficient for robust video understanding and that structured evidence supervision is essential for the development of more reliable and interpretable VideoQA systems.
Tsinghua AI