Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a human-in-the-loop pipeline designed to measure the alignment of undergraduate computer science curricula with evolving international guidelines, specifically comparing CS2013 and CS2023. By employing a structured corpus approach and semantic retrieval methods, the study identifies coverage gaps and competency articulation, revealing that the program maintains similar coverage levels across both guidelines while highlighting a decline in cognitive depth under CS2023. Key findings indicate that while the program covers approximately 50% of knowledge units, it struggles to meet the increased competency depth expectations set by the newer guidelines, emphasizing the need for curriculum adjustments in response to evolving standards.
Coverage of computer science curricula remains stagnant despite evolving guidelines, with a significant drop in competency depth under the latest standards.
Undergraduate computer science is governed by international curricular guidelines revised about once a decade, yet programs lack a reliable, reproducible way to measure how completely they cover the current guidelines and how that coverage shifts when the guidelines are restructured. We address this with a human-in-the-loop pipeline that measures a program's coverage of an external body of knowledge, applied longitudinally to one accredited BSc in Computer Science against Computer Science Curricula 2013 (CS2013) and 2023 (CS2023). The pipeline represents the program and each guideline as structured corpora, generates candidate course-to-knowledge-unit matches by semantic retrieval, and confirms them through human judgment under an explicit coverage definition. Of seven benchmarked retrievers, a reciprocal-rank-fusion ensemble was strongest, and a reputed long-context model underperformed a small sentence model, so retriever choice must be measured. Both maps were validated by an independent second rater (Cohen's kappa 0.64 for CS2023, 0.69 for CS2013). The program covers 49.7% of CS2023 and 50.9% of CS2013 knowledge units, near-constant across a decade. Extending the same retrieve-then-confirm design to competency articulation and cognitive depth shows that the program articulates the competency for ~88% of covered units under each guideline, yet delivers it at the recommended depth for 76% of present units under CS2023 against 95% under CS2013, a gap reflecting the newer guideline's raised expectations, not the program. The longitudinal comparison separates persistent structural gaps (parallel and distributed computing, foundations of programming languages, systems fundamentals), uncovered against both guidelines and ABET, from differences that reflect the standard's evolution. The instrument is reusable and available from the authors on request.
