Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates how self-efficacy and student favorability towards practice formats influence learning outcomes in both paper-based and Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS)-based environments. By employing a counterbalanced within-subject design, the authors reveal that students with lower baseline self-efficacy experience greater learning gains, particularly when they favor the tutoring method. Notably, while ITS practice did not enhance post-training self-efficacy compared to paper-based methods, the interaction between motivational factors and practice format highlights the need for personalized educational interventions.
Students with lower self-efficacy can achieve greater learning gains when they favor the tutoring method, challenging assumptions about the superiority of technology in education.
Motivational factors such as self-efficacy and how favorably students feel toward practice play a crucial role in shaping learning, particularly in technology-supported environments. Yet, educational interventions often overlook how these factors interact with practice format. This paper examines the influence of self-efficacy and favorability on learning outcomes across two common practice formats: paper-based and system-based tutoring practice. Using a counterbalanced within-subject design with matched problem sets, we isolate the effect of practice format while modeling motivational differences. Results indicate that students with lower baseline self-efficacy achieved greater learning gains regardless of practice format. Among students with lower baseline self-efficacy, greater favorability toward the tutor was associated with greater learning gains during tutor practice, whereas the pattern differed in paper-based practice. Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS)-based practice did not significantly improve post-training self-efficacy relative to paper-based methods. These findings underscore the potential value of tailoring practice format to students' motivational profiles, as the benefits of tutor- and paper-based practice varied with baseline self-efficacy and favorability. They lay the groundwork for future research on how instructional formats can be aligned more effectively with learners' motivational needs.
CMU ML