Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces ResearchClawBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the end-to-end autonomous scientific research capabilities of AI coding agents across 40 tasks in 10 scientific domains. By grounding tasks in real published papers and utilizing expert-curated multimodal rubrics, the benchmark allows for a nuanced assessment of both re-discovery and new discovery in scientific research. Evaluation results reveal that current auto-research agents, including Claude Code and Claude-Opus-4.7, fall short of reliable re-discovery, highlighting significant areas for improvement in experimental and evidence alignment.
Current AI agents struggle to reliably rediscover scientific knowledge, with top performers averaging only 21.5 out of a possible score, revealing critical gaps in their research capabilities.
AI coding agents are increasingly used for scientific work, but their end-to-end autonomous research capability remains difficult to verify. We present ResearchClawBench, a benchmark for evaluating autonomous scientific research across 40 tasks from 10 scientific domains. Each task is grounded in a real published paper, provides related literature and raw data, and hides the target paper during evaluation. Expert-curated multimodal rubrics decompose the target scientific artifacts into weighted criteria, enabling evaluation of target-paper-level re-discovery while leaving room for new discovery. We evaluate seven autonomous research (auto-research) agents under a unified protocol and seventeen native LLMs through the lightweight ResearchHarness. Current systems remain far from reliable re-discovery: the strongest autonomous agent, Claude Code, averages 21.5, and the strongest ResearchHarness LLM, Claude-Opus-4.7, averages 20.7, with an LLM frontier mean of only 26.5. Error analysis shows that failures concentrate in experimental protocol mismatch, evidence mismatch, and missing scientific core. ResearchClawBench provides a reproducible evaluation frontier for measuring progress toward autonomous scientific research.
Tsinghua AI