Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a dialogue-based framework for interactive explanation of robot safety decisions in human-robot collaboration (HRC), enabling users to query the robot's reasoning behind safety interventions. The framework grounds explanations in constraint-based safety evaluation, allowing for causal, contrastive, and counterfactual queries derived from the decision trace. By bounding counterfactual reasoning under certified safety parameters, the system ensures that interactive exploration doesn't compromise operational safety guarantees, demonstrated in a construction robotics scenario.
Unlock robot safety reasoning: a new dialogue interface lets humans ask "why," "why not," and "what if" about robot safety interventions, grounded directly in the robot's internal constraint-based decision-making.
As robots increasingly operate in shared, safety critical environments, acting safely is no longer sufficient robots must also make their safety decisions intelligible to human collaborators. In human robot collaboration (HRC), behaviours such as stopping or switching modes are often triggered by internal safety constraints that remain opaque to nearby workers. We present a dialogue based framework for interactive explanation of safety decisions in HRC. The approach tightly couples explanation with constraint based safety evaluation, grounding dialogue in the same state and constraint representations that govern behaviour selection. Explanations are derived directly from the recorded decision trace, enabling users to pose causal ("Why?"), contrastive ("Why not?"), and counterfactual ("What if?") queries about safety interventions. Counterfactual reasoning is evaluated in a bounded manner under fixed, certified safety parameters, ensuring that interactive exploration does not relax operational guarantees. We instantiate the framework in a construction robotics scenario and provide a structured operational trace illustrating how constraint aware dialogue clarifies safety interventions and supports coordinated task recovery. By treating explanation as an operational interface to safety control, this work advances a design perspective for interactive, safety aware autonomy in HRC.
