Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper critiques the validity-centered approach to combating misinformation in search engines, arguing it's insufficient for addressing the complexities of information ecosystems. It proposes shifting focus towards reliability signals and inter-subjective agreement as more effective indicators of trustworthiness. The authors advocate for designing search environments that prioritize diverse perspectives and highlight areas of consensus rather than solely focusing on objective truth.
Fighting misinformation online requires moving beyond a quest for "truth" and instead surfacing signals of reliability and inter-subjective agreement.
Search engines and information platforms are increasingly scrutinized for their role in spreading misinformation. Traditional responses often focus on detecting falsehoods or verifying the ultimate validity of claims. This paper argues that such a validity-centered framing is inadequate for the epistemic challenges of search environments.
