Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the security vulnerabilities of Model Context Protocol (MCP)-based AI systems, focusing on caller identity confusion. It demonstrates that the lack of caller authentication in MCP servers leads to insecure authorization, where a single authorization can grant access to multiple untrusted callers. The study reveals that most MCP servers rely on persistent authorization states and fail to enforce authentication at the per-tool level, thereby expanding the attack surface.
MCP-based AI systems are alarmingly vulnerable to caller identity confusion, allowing unauthorized access to sensitive tools and operations after just one initial authorization.
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open and standardized interface that enables large language models (LLMs) to interact with external tools and services, and is increasingly adopted by AI agents. However, the security of MCP-based systems remains largely unexplored.In this work, we conduct a large-scale security analysis of MCP servers integrated within MCP clients. We show that treating MCP servers as trusted entities without authenticating the caller identity is fundamentally insecure. Since MCP servers often cannot distinguish who is invoking a request, a single authorization decision may implicitly grant access to multiple, potentially untrusted callers.Our empirical study reveals that most MCP servers rely on persistent authorization states, allowing tool invocations after an initial authorization without re-authentication, regardless of the caller. In addition, many MCP servers fail to enforce authentication at the per-tool level, enabling unauthorized access to sensitive operations.These findings demonstrate that one-time authorization and server-level trust significantly expand the attack surface of MCP-based systems, highlighting the need for explicit caller authentication and fine-grained authorization mechanisms.
