Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper establishes a generalization bound for discontinuous classifiers that improves inversely with class stability, defined as the expected distance to the decision boundary. They derive a "law of robustness" showing that interpolating models with parameter count near the number of data points must be unstable, implying overparameterization is necessary for high stability. Empirical results validate the theory, demonstrating that stability increases with model size and correlates with test performance, unlike norm-based measures.
Overparameterization isn't just a quirk of deep learning; it's provably *necessary* for stable, robust classification, even for discontinuous functions.
The relationship between overparameterization, stability, and generalization remains incompletely understood in the setting of discontinuous classifiers. We address this gap by establishing a generalization bound for finite function classes that improves inversely with class stability, defined as the expected distance to the decision boundary in the input domain (margin). Interpreting class stability as a quantifiable notion of robustness, we derive as a corollary a law of robustness for classification that extends the results of Bubeck and Sellke beyond smoothness assumptions to discontinuous functions. In particular, any interpolating model with $p \approx n$ parameters on $n$ data points must be unstable, implying that substantial overparameterization is necessary to achieve high stability. We obtain analogous results for parameterized infinite function classes by analyzing a stronger robustness measure derived from the margin in the codomain, which we refer to as the normalized co-stability. Experiments support our theory: stability increases with model size and correlates with test performance, while traditional norm-based measures remain largely uninformative.
