Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper presents a large-scale empirical study of code quality in 178 AV perception models from the KITTI and NuScenes leaderboards, revealing a significant gap between benchmark performance and production readiness. Static analysis using Pylint, Bandit, and Radon identified code errors, security vulnerabilities, and maintainability issues. The study found that only 7.3% of repositories meet basic production-readiness criteria, highlighting the need for improved code quality and security practices in AV perception research.
Leaderboard-topping AV perception models often harbor alarming code quality issues, with the vast majority failing basic production-readiness checks despite their benchmark success.
Autonomous vehicle (AV) perception models are typically evaluated solely on benchmark performance metrics, with limited attention to code quality, production readiness and long-term maintainability. This creates a significant gap between research excellence and real-world deployment in safety-critical systems subject to international safety standards. To address this gap, we present the first large-scale empirical study of software quality in AV perception repositories, systematically analyzing 178 unique models from the KITTI and NuScenes 3D Object Detection leaderboards. Using static analysis tools (Pylint, Bandit, and Radon), we evaluated code errors, security vulnerabilities, maintainability, and development practices. Our findings revealed that only 7.3% of the studied repositories meet basic production-readiness criteria, defined as having zero critical errors and no high-severity security vulnerabilities. Security issues are highly concentrated, with the top five issues responsible for almost 80% of occurrences, which prompted us to develop a set of actionable guidelines to prevent them. Additionally, the adoption of Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment pipelines was correlated with better code maintainability. Our findings highlight that leaderboard performance does not reflect production readiness and that targeted interventions could substantially improve the quality and safety of AV perception code.
