Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the concept of "promptness," an aerodynamic manipulability metric, for multirotor control, and frames the problem of balancing energy consumption and promptness as a multi-objective optimization problem on affine fibers. It leverages a diffeomorphic transformation to linearize the propulsion model, enabling a rigorous analysis of the trade-off between energy and promptness. Through a hexarotor case study, the paper demonstrates how hardware limitations and rotor directionality (unidirectional vs. reversible) significantly impact the Pareto frontier, revealing fundamental incompatibilities between endurance and agility with reversible propellers.
Reversible propellers on multirotors enable antagonistic rotor co-contraction that maximizes agility but fundamentally sacrifices energy efficiency, revealing a hardware-driven trade-off.
In robotics and human biomechanics, the tension between energy economy and kinematic readiness is well recognized; this work brings that fundamental principle to aerial multirotors. We show that the limited torque of the motors and the nonlinear aerodynamic map from rotor speed to thrust naturally give rise to the novel concept of promptness-a metric akin to dynamic aerodynamic manipulability. By treating energy consumption as a competing objective and introducing a geometric fiber-bundle formulation, we turn redundancy resolution into a principled multi-objective program on affine fibers. The use of the diffeomorphic transformation linearizing the signed-quadratic propulsion model allows us to lay the foundations for a rigorous study of the interplay between these costs. Through an illustrative case study on 4-DoF allocation on the hexarotor, we reveal that this interplay is fiber-dependent and physically shaped by hardware inequalities. For unidirectional thrusters, the feasible fibers are compact, yielding interior allocations and a short Pareto arc, while torque demands break symmetry and separate the optima. Conversely, with reversible propellers, the null space enables antagonistic rotor co-contraction that drives promptness to hardware limits, making optimal endurance and agility fundamentally incompatible in those regimes. Ultimately, rather than relying on heuristic tuning or black box algorithms to empirically improve task execution, this framework provides a foundational understanding of why and how to achieve agility through geometry-aware control allocation, offering possible guidance for vehicle design, certification metrics, and threat-aware flight operation.
