Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces SoftVTBench, a visuo-tactile dataset designed to enhance the evaluation of deformable-object manipulation by incorporating physical interaction quality metrics alongside traditional task success measures. The dataset features 4,000 expert demonstrations and synchronizes multiple sensory modalities, including RGB images, tactile data, and proprioceptive feedback, enabling a more nuanced understanding of manipulation performance. Key findings reveal that while policies can achieve task success, they often exceed deformation tolerances, highlighting the need for improved multimodal integration in robotic manipulation tasks.
Policies may succeed in tasks but still violate deformation tolerances, revealing a critical gap in current evaluation methods for deformable-object manipulation.
Physical interaction quality is central to deformable-object manipulation, yet most benchmarks evaluate task success alone. A policy may complete the task while allowing slip or causing excessive compression. A primary bottleneck is the absence of visuo-tactile datasets that pair policy-visible contact observations with independent physical ground truth over complete tasks. We introduce SoftVTBench, a visuo-tactile dataset for physical-interaction-aware deformable-object manipulation. It contains 4,000 expert demonstrations and more than 50 assets, including volumetric deformable objects and visually matched rigid twins. At 20 Hz, each episode synchronizes multi-view RGB, dual-finger tactile RGB and marker motion, proprioception, language, and binary and continuous gripper actions, alongside evaluator-only finite-element (FEM) states. Building upon this dataset, we establish a closed-loop benchmark that uses fixed object-specific calibration to define the Deformation-aware Success Rate (DSR), which counts a rollout as successful only when it completes the task and keeps peak normalized deformation within tolerance. Across Diffusion Policy, $\pi_{0.5}$, and FastWAM, all 12 in-distribution configurations contain successful rollouts that violate the deformation tolerance, accounting for 0.7--24% of each configuration's successes. Under distribution shift, visuo-tactile variants achieve higher task success in all six policy--suite comparisons and higher DSR in five, whereas their in-distribution benefits are mixed. These results show that making touch available does not by itself ensure effective multimodal fusion. SoftVTBench therefore provides a common visuo-tactile resource for studying not only whether a policy succeeds, but how it physically interacts with deformable objects and when touch improves that interaction.