Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces SC2R, a semantics-constrained counterfactual recourse framework designed to enhance educational decision support by ensuring that recommended interventions are feasible and actionable within specific educational constraints. The framework integrates a calibrated predictive model with integer programming for generating intervention plans, while employing a lightweight RDF vocabulary and SHACL validation to enforce various constraints such as timing and budget. Evaluations on the OULAD dataset demonstrate that SC2R not only generates compact intervention plans at scale but also effectively identifies infeasible plans that traditional optimization methods might overlook, emphasizing the importance of semantic validation in educational contexts.
Counterfactual recourse in education becomes truly actionable when recommendations are not just model-valid but also semantically feasible and machine-checkable.
Learning analytics models can identify students at risk of poor performance, but they do not directly indicate which interventions are feasible, actionable, and compatible with educational constraints. This paper introduces SC2R, a semantics-constrained counterfactual recourse framework for educational decision support. SC2R combines a calibrated predictive model, integer-programming-based recourse generation over discrete action variables, a lightweight RDF vocabulary for intervention-plan representation, and SHACL validation for enforcing timing, budget, immutability, and availability constraints. The framework is evaluated offline on the OULAD dataset using snapshots constructed relative to each assessment at two decision horizons. Results show that the predictive component provides strong performance, that compact intervention plans can be generated at scale, and that semantic validation reveals infeasible plans that lighter optimization-only settings would otherwise accept. Rather than claiming causal improvement in student outcomes, this work shows that counterfactual recourse becomes more operationally meaningful in education when recommendations are not only model-valid, but also semantically feasible and machine-checkable.
