Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study critically evaluates the validation practices of machine learning models for predicting ship fuel consumption, highlighting the risks of temporal leakage in traditional random train-test splits. By employing Time Series Cross-Validation (TSCV) and Blocked TSCV (BTSCV) on high-frequency operational data from the CCGS \textit{Sir Wilfrid Laurier}, the authors demonstrate that time-aware evaluation methods yield more reliable performance metrics. The findings reveal significant discrepancies in model performance when validated under time-aware schemes compared to conventional methods, underscoring the importance of proper validation in maritime fuel consumption modeling.
Time-aware validation reveals that traditional model evaluation methods can significantly misrepresent the performance of fuel consumption predictions, leading to misguided operational decisions.
Ship fuel consumption (SFC) prediction supports vessel operation optimisation, emissions estimation, and decision support systems (DSS) for sustainable maritime transportation. Numerous data-driven fuel models have been developed over the past two decades, but a critical and often overlooked limitation lies in their validation practices: most studies evaluate performance using random train--test splits, which, applied to high-frequency records, admit temporal leakage and yield optimistic results that do not reflect deployment conditions. This paper examines that gap using time-aware evaluation, specifically Time Series Cross-Validation (TSCV) and Blocked TSCV (BTSCV). Using the Canadian Coast Guard Ship (CCGS) \textit{Sir Wilfrid Laurier} as a case study, six regression models and a physics baseline are tuned under three time-aware schemes and three feature configurations, then evaluated on a common chronological hold-out set drawn from approximately 3.88 million steady-state 1\,Hz records.
