Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study analyzes 25,264 agentic pull requests (PRs) across 2,361 popular GitHub repositories to understand the adoption and management of agentic coding tools in software development. The findings reveal that while a small subset of projects shows intensive adoption, most repositories generate only one to two agentic PRs over three months, with small projects exhibiting higher participation. Additionally, human oversight is predominantly managed by a single developer, indicating that successful integration of agent-generated contributions hinges on both agent capabilities and the organizational processes surrounding their use.
Despite the promise of agentic coding tools, most GitHub projects see minimal adoption, with only a few exceeding the industry standard for PRs per participant.
Agentic coding tools are increasingly capable of generating and submitting pull requests (PRs) to software projects, introducing new forms of human-agent collaboration in software development. While prior studies have examined PR-level outcomes of agent-generated contributions, less is known about how agentic coding tools are adopted and managed at the project level. In this paper, we analyze 25,264 agentic PRs from 2,361 popular GitHub repositories to investigate (1) the adoption of agentic coding tools, (2) project-level agentic PR productivity, and (3) human-agent collaboration patterns. Our results show that the median repository generates only one to two agentic PRs during a three-month period, indicating that intensive adoption remains concentrated in a small subset of projects. At the same time, small projects (1-5 contributors) exhibit higher participation ratios and average levels of agentic PR activity than medium-sized and large projects. We also observe substantial variation in project-level agentic PR productivity. While a small number of projects exceed an industry-reported estimate of 36 PRs per participant during the three-month observation period, most projects remain below this threshold. Finally, human-agent collaboration is dominated by a single-human oversight model, in which one developer reviews and/or modifies the agent's contributions, while multi-human collaboration patterns remain uncommon. These findings provide early empirical evidence on how open-source projects organize human oversight around agentic coding tools and suggest that successful integration of agent-generated contributions depends not only on advances in agent capabilities but also on the human and organizational processes that govern their use. Because this study captures an early snapshot of agent adoption, future work should continue to track how adoption patterns evolve over time.
