Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces EVOQUANT, a self-evolving framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) for optimizing quantitative trading strategies by diagnosing performance issues and generating controlled candidate edits. The method employs a multi-stage verification pipeline to select the best strategies and distills the optimization process into reusable knowledge for continuous improvement. Experimental results demonstrate a significant enhancement in the Sharpe ratio across various strategies, with the best strategy achieving a 199% relative improvement, thereby transforming the optimization process from manual to automated and verifiable.
Automated strategy optimization using LLMs can boost Sharpe ratios by over 199%, revolutionizing quantitative trading practices.
Quantitative strategy optimization remains largely manual, requiring domain experts to identify weak signals, tune risk-control rules, and repeatedly validate iterative revisions. Large language models can accelerate this process, but directly relying on them to rewrite trading strategies often introduces hallucinated edits, strategy drift, and backtest overfitting. We propose EVOQUANT, a self-Evolving Verifier-guided framework for strategy Optimization in Quantitative trading. Our method utilizes LLMs to deeply diagnose performance bottlenecks, generates semantically controlled candidate edits, selects the best strategy through a multi-stage verification pipeline, and distills optimization experience into reusable knowledge for continual self-improvement. We evaluate our method using seven representative strategies: four from the A-share market and three from the Crypto market. Experimental results show that our method significantly improves the Sharpe ratio across all tested strategies: the average test Sharpe increases from -0.298 to 0.538, and the best-performing strategy achieves a 199% relative improvement. Ablation studies and stress tests under stricter conditions further validate the effectiveness and robustness of the framework. Overall, this work transforms quantitative strategy optimization from costly manual trial and error into an automated and verifiable iterative paradigm, offering a new path for applying large language models to financial strategy research.
