Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the challenges faced by compute-constrained quadrupeds in navigation, specifically when operating below their optimal controller rates due to shared resources. By analyzing the impact of latency on proprioceptive navigation, the authors demonstrate that a climb-settle cadence significantly reduces overshoot errors during stair traversal compared to traditional in-motion detection methods. Their findings suggest a critical loop rate for effective navigation, providing a practical deployment guideline for mapping-free quadruped inspection systems.
Climb-settle cadence can eliminate overshoot errors in quadruped stair navigation, outperforming traditional methods even at lower loop rates.
Compute-constrained quadrupeds often run their navigation loop far below the controller's design rate: sharing the onboard Jetson Orin with the vision pipeline slows our stair loop to about 15 Hz. This latency breaks a standard proprioceptive pattern: declaring stair-summit arrival from the body-pitch signal while still climbing. On a stepped platform whose 50 cm top is shorter than the robot (Unitree Go2, about 75 cm), in-motion detection overshoots the top edge with probability rising with the per-period advance v/f (the slowest about 15 Hz cell partly diluted by a separate non-arrival mode), whereas a climb-settle cadence holds overshoot near zero at every loop rate (pooled 22/45 vs 1/45 over about 30/20/15 Hz; Fisher p about 2.4e-7; 7/15 vs 0/15 at the deployed about 15 Hz). A logistic dose-response model in v/f captures the failure; a pre-specified 40 Hz out-of-sample test favours the protocol-clean fit (33% observed vs 43%/22% predicted), giving a deployment rule (critical loop rate about 19 Hz at 0.30 m/s). The detector sits in a fully onboard, mapping-free and learning-free stack: built-in inertial measurement unit, four foot-force channels, three 1-D ranges, one line camera, chaining line-following, a three-segment maneuver for 90-degree corners in a 55 cm corridor (20/20 contact-free vs 14/20 with 12 wall contacts for in-place yaw; exit-heading error 1.56 degrees vs 5.64 degrees), and stair traversal, completing the inspection course in 18/20 trials (90%). Results are from a single course geometry, platform, and operator.
