Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study explores the use of LLM-generated design problems (DPs) to enhance assessments of higher-order thinking (HOT) in project-based learning (PjBL) within computing education. By surveying 31 instructors and evaluating 80 LLM-generated DPs, the research reveals that while instructors appreciate the value of DPs, the effort required for their creation poses a challenge; however, LLMs can efficiently generate high-quality prompts that align well with expert opinions. Notably, student performance on DP tasks showed a negligible correlation with traditional project grades, indicating that DPs may effectively assess distinct aspects of HOT and promote deeper cognitive engagement among students.
LLMs can generate high-quality design problems that reveal distinct dimensions of higher-order thinking, challenging traditional assessment methods in project-based learning.
Project-based learning (PjBL) is common in computing education, but traditional assessments of PjBL often fail to capture higher-order thinking (HOT), especially in transfer contexts. This study introduces"design problems"(DPs): concise, scenario-based prompts that require applying project concepts in new situations, to address this gap. We examined instructor perceptions, the ability of large language models (LLMs) to generate DPs, and student experiences. Surveys of 31 instructors, evaluation of 80 LLM-generated DPs, and student performance data showed that while instructors value DPs, creation effort is a barrier. LLMs helped by producing high-quality prompts with strong expert agreement. Students rated DPs from different LLMs similarly, and their performance on DP tasks showed negligible correlation with traditional project grades, suggesting DPs may capture distinct aspects of HOT. Keystroke data also suggested deeper cognitive engagement of students through planning and revision behaviors. Overall, DPs appear to be a useful complement to traditional assessments, especially in situations where AI use or collaboration may undermine individual learning.
