Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
Microsoft Research
UWAuthors are listed in alphabetical orderKorea UUQYaleJul 8, 2026arXiv:2607.07673This paper introduces MedPMC, an automated framework that curates high-fidelity medical image-text pairs from 6.1 million PubMed Central articles, resulting in 11 million pairs that significantly enhance multimodal foundation models. The framework demonstrates strong performance across various evaluation metrics, achieving an F1 score of 93.2 for initial screening and a notable 7.1 percentage point improvement in average zero-shot AUC over existing biomedical CLIP models. Manual reviews confirmed the clinical relevance of 95.3% of the curated images, underscoring the framework's potential to elevate the quality of medical multimodal data for AI applications.
High-fidelity curation of medical multimodal data can drastically improve AI model performance, with MedPMC achieving remarkable clinical relevance and benchmark results.
Medicine is inherently multimodal, requiring clinicians to synthesize information across diverse data streams. Yet the development of multimodal foundation models is constrained by limited access to large-scale, high-quality clinical data. Although PubMed Central (PMC) offers a complementary source of expert-authored image-text data, existing PMC-derived resources remain limited in fidelity, reproducibility, and clinical validation. We introduce MedPMC, an automated, continuously updatable framework that transforms permissively licensed literature into high-fidelity infrastructure for medical multimodal models. Applied to 6.1 million PMC articles, MedPMC curated 11 million medical image-text pairs. Component evaluations showed strong performance for initial screening (F1 = 93.2), multi-panel figure detection (F1 = 96.5), figure separation (mAP = 89.8), caption separation and alignment (F1 = 81.4; ROUGE-L = 85.3), and medical figure classification (F1 = 96.5). Manual review by five annotators, three with medical training, found 95.3% of MedPMC images medically relevant, versus 19.7% in a prior PMC-derived dataset. Across 26 benchmarks spanning 11 specialties, a MedPMC-trained CLIP-style model improved average zero-shot AUC by 7.1 percentage points over the strongest architecture-matched biomedical CLIP baseline despite using fewer than half as many image-text pairs. As the vision encoder in a multimodal large language model, it improved medical visual question-answering by 1.9 and 16.9 percentage points across two benchmarks. In 10,524 Yale New Haven Health System dermatology photographs, it improved morphology-to-image retrieval Recall@5 by 11.7 percentage points. These findings show that high-fidelity literature curation strengthens medical multimodal foundation models across benchmark and clinical settings. We publicly release the framework, corpus, benchmarks, and pretrained models.
