Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces quality-aware self-distillation (QASD) for enhancing vision-language models (VLMs) in graphical user interface (GUI) grounding tasks. By integrating soft correctness-aware gating and teacher-probability scaling, the method improves the reliability of teacher signals during self-distillation, addressing the degradation of coordinate-token quality in naive on-policy self-distillation. Empirical results across six benchmarks demonstrate that QASD significantly enhances model performance, outperforming existing strong baselines and highlighting the complementary roles of its components in refining supervision quality.
Combining soft correctness-aware gating with teacher-probability scaling leads to a substantial boost in GUI grounding performance, revealing the critical importance of signal quality in self-distillation.
Graphical user interface (GUI) grounding requires vision-language models (VLMs) to identify small target elements in high-resolution screenshots and predict precise screen coordinates. On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) is a promising post-training approach for this coordinate-sensitive task, since it provides dense token-level teacher signals beyond hard coordinate labels. However, naive OPSD is not well suited to GUI grounding: OPSD evaluates the teacher on student-generated prefixes, the quality of coordinate-token teacher signals can degrade when the prefix has already deviated from the target coordinate, leading to unreliable teacher signal. To mitigate this, We propose quality-aware self-distillation for VLM-based GUI grounding, which improves coordinate-token teacher-signal quality through soft correctness-aware gating and teacher-probability scaling. The soft correctness-aware gate checks whether the teacher's current coordinate-token prediction can still be completed into the ground-truth box under the student-generated prefix. If not, the corresponding teacher signal is down-weighted. Teacher-probability scaling then uses the teacher's confidence as a lightweight factor to further calibrate the strength of the gated supervision. A key empirical finding is that neither component alone improves overall performance, whereas combining them consistently improves performance. This suggests that the two mechanisms play complementary roles: correctness-aware gating suppresses unreliable coordinate-token supervision, while teacher-probability scaling calibrates the strength of the remaining signals. Experiments across six GUI grounding benchmarks show that our method consistently improves the base model and outperforms strong baselines.
