Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces CODA-BENCH, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the combined capabilities of code and data intelligence in data-intensive environments. By constructing a data-rich Linux sandbox with hundreds of datasets, the authors create 1,009 tasks that simulate realistic development scenarios, where agents must navigate complex file hierarchies and generate code for data-driven tasks. The findings reveal that even advanced agents struggle with this integration, achieving only a 61.1% success rate, underscoring a significant shortcoming in current AI capabilities for handling data-intensive tasks.
Agents fail to effectively integrate data discovery with code execution, achieving only 61.1% success in real-world-like scenarios.
Advanced agents are increasingly demonstrating the potential to operate as autonomous engineers, creating a growing demand for evaluation benchmarks that capture the complexity of real-world development. Such environments typically involve both complex code and large-scale data (i.e., file system). However, existing benchmarks usually evaluate code-centric or data-centric capabilities in isolation, leaving a clear gap with real development scenarios. In this paper, we bridge this gap by introducing CODA-BENCH, the first benchmark to jointly evaluate code and data intelligence in a data-intensive environment. We construct a data-intensive Linux sandbox based on the Kaggle ecosystem (containing hundreds of datasets), where agents must actively explore complex file hierarchies to identify relevant resources and generate code for data-driven analytical tasks. CODA-BENCH comprises 1,009 tasks spanning 31 communities, with each task environment containing an average of 980 files, simulating realistic data scale and noise. Evaluations of advanced agents reveal that even top-performing systems struggle to effectively integrate data discovery with code execution, achieving a success rate of only 61.1%. These results highlight a substantial gap in current agentic capabilities for data-intensive tasks and point to promising directions for future research.
