Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces DR-DCI, a retriever-steered framework that enhances Direct Corpus Interaction (DCI) by dynamically expanding a local workspace with relevant documents instead of operating over a full corpus. By integrating scalable retrieval with precise DCI operations, DR-DCI achieves significant improvements in accuracy and efficiency, reaching 73.3% accuracy on Browsecomp-Plus and maintaining stability across document scales from 100K to 10M. The results indicate that DR-DCI outperforms traditional retrieval methods and raw DCI, demonstrating its effectiveness in handling large corpora for agentic search tasks.
DR-DCI achieves a remarkable 73.3% accuracy in agentic search tasks while efficiently scaling from 100K to 10M documents, outperforming traditional methods.
Agentic search over large corpora relies on retriever-mediated interfaces (e.g., BM25 or ColBERT) for scalable candidate discovery. While effective at ranking relevant documents, these interfaces expose evidence only as ranked results or bounded document views, limiting agents' ability to reorganize material and verify constraints across documents. Direct Corpus Interaction (DCI) addresses this limitation by exposing shell-executable corpus operations for flexible search, filtering, comparison, and verification. However, full-corpus terminal commands become slow and unstable as the corpus grows, degrading performance and efficiency. We introduce DR-DCI, a retriever-steered DCI framework that treats retrieval as an agent-callable action for expanding a local workspace. Rather than operating directly over the full corpus, the agent dynamically pulls relevant documents into an evolving workspace and conducts DCI operations within it. This design combines retriever-level recall with DCI-style precision: retrieval keeps exploration scalable, while DCI preserves the local operations needed for effective evidence resolution. Experiments show that DR-DCI is both effective and efficient across scales. On Browsecomp-Plus, DR-DCI reaches 71.2\% accuracy, improving over raw DCI and ablated variants by up to 8.3 points while reducing tool usage, wall time, and estimated cost. With workspace-preserving context reset, accuracy further improves to 73.3\%. In corpus-scaling experiments, DR-DCI remains effective from 100K to 10M documents, whereas raw DCI becomes unstable and BM25 performs substantially worse. DR-DCI also scales to a 20M-scale file-per-document Wiki-18 QA setting, achieving an average score of 63.0 across six benchmarks and outperforming retrieval-based and trained search-agent baselines. Ablation analysis further shows that ranked previews and inter-document DCI are key to performance.
