Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces ToM-PD, a new task for persuasive dialogue grounded in the Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) framework, and a corresponding dataset, ToM-BPD, to address limitations of LLMs in capturing dependencies among mental states. To improve LLM reasoning about mental states, they propose Think Thrice Before You Speak (TTBYS), a knowledge-enhanced stepwise reasoning framework. Experiments show that Qwen3-8B with TTBYS outperforms GPT-5 in predicting desires, beliefs, and persuasive strategies, demonstrating enhanced interpretability and consistency.
Despite its smaller size, Qwen3-8B, when guided by a novel "Think Thrice Before You Speak" framework, achieves superior performance to GPT-5 in predicting desires, beliefs, and persuasive strategies within persuasive dialogues.
Persuasive dialogue requires reasoning about others' latent mental states, a capability known as Theory of Mind (ToM). However, due to reliance on simple prompting strategies and insufficient ToM knowledge, existing LLMs often fail to capture the intrinsic dependencies among mental states, leading to fragmented representations and unstable reasoning. To address these challenges, we introduce the ToM-based Persuasive Dialogue (ToM-PD) task, grounded in the Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) framework, which explicitly models the sequential dependencies among mental states in multi-turn dialogues. To facilitate research on this task, we construct a large-scale annotated dataset, ToM-based Broad Persuasive Dialogues (ToM-BPD), capturing fine-grained mental states and corresponding persuasive strategies. We further propose Think Thrice Before You Speak (TTBYS), a knowledge-enhanced stepwise reasoning framework that leverages both explicit and implicit prior experiences to improve LLMs' inference of desires, beliefs, and persuasive strategies. Experimental results demonstrate that Qwen3-8B equipped with TTBYS outperforms GPT-5 by 1.20%, 22.80%, and 16.97% in predicting desires, beliefs, and persuasive strategies, respectively. Case studies further show that our approach enhances interpretability and consistency in reasoning.
