Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
Goal2Skill introduces a dual-system framework for long-horizon embodied manipulation that separates high-level semantic reasoning (planning) from low-level motor execution (control). A VLM-based planner manages task memory, decomposes goals, verifies outcomes, and corrects errors, while a VLA-based executor uses diffusion to generate actions based on filtered observations. Experiments on RMBench show Goal2Skill significantly outperforms baselines, achieving a 32.4% success rate versus 9.8% for the best baseline, demonstrating the importance of structured memory and closed-loop recovery.
Achieve 3x higher success in long-horizon robotic manipulation by explicitly separating high-level planning from low-level control, enabling memory-aware reasoning and adaptive replanning.
Recent vision-language-action (VLA) systems have demonstrated strong capabilities in embodied manipulation. However, most existing VLA policies rely on limited observation windows and end-to-end action prediction, which makes them brittle in long-horizon, memory-dependent tasks with partial observability, occlusions, and multi-stage dependencies. Such tasks require not only precise visuomotor control, but also persistent memory, adaptive task decomposition, and explicit recovery from execution failures. To address these limitations, we propose a dual-system framework for long-horizon embodied manipulation. Our framework explicitly separates high-level semantic reasoning from low-level motor execution. A high-level planner, implemented as a VLM-based agentic module, maintains structured task memory and performs goal decomposition, outcome verification, and error-driven correction. A low-level executor, instantiated as a VLA-based visuomotor controller, carries out each sub-task through diffusion-based action generation conditioned on geometry-preserving filtered observations. Together, the two systems form a closed loop between planning and execution, enabling memory-aware reasoning, adaptive replanning, and robust online recovery. Experiments on representative RMBench tasks show that the proposed framework substantially outperforms representative baselines, achieving a 32.4% average success rate compared with 9.8% for the strongest baseline. Ablation studies further confirm the importance of structured memory and closed-loop recovery for long-horizon manipulation.
