Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces federated distributional reinforcement learning (FedDistRL), a novel approach to federated RL that focuses on federating quantile value function critics rather than policies or expected value functions. To mitigate the mean-smearing effect of parameter averaging, the authors propose TR-FedDistRL, which incorporates a distributional trust region around a risk-aware Wasserstein barycenter computed locally on each client. Experiments across various environments demonstrate that TR-FedDistRL reduces mean-smearing, improves safety proxies, and lowers critic/policy drift compared to traditional federated and non-federated RL methods.
By federating distributional critics and using a Wasserstein barycenter trust region, TR-FedDistRL avoids the dangerous "mean-smearing" that can make federated RL unsafe in critical applications.
Federated reinforcement learning typically aggregates value functions or policies by parameter averaging, which emphasizes expected return and can obscure statistical multimodality and tail behavior that matter in safety-critical settings. We formalize federated distributional reinforcement learning (FedDistRL), where clients parametrize quantile value function critics and federate these networks only. We also propose TR-FedDistRL, which builds a per client, risk-aware Wasserstein barycenter over a temporal buffer. This local barycenter provides a reference region to constrain the parameter averaged critic, ensuring necessary distributional information is not averaged out during the federation process. The distributional trust region is implemented as a shrink-squash step around this reference. Under fixed-policy evaluation, the feasibility map is nonexpansive and the update is contractive in a probe-set Wasserstein metric under evaluation. Experiments on a bandit, multi-agent gridworld, and continuous highway environment show reduced mean-smearing, improved safety proxies (catastrophe/accident rate), and lower critic/policy drift versus mean-oriented and non-federated baselines.
