Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the challenges and concerns surrounding the use of generative AI in Hawaiian public schools, where integrating Hawaiian language and culture is mandated. Through co-design workshops with 22 educators, the authors identified concerns about cultural misrepresentation and biases in AI-generated content. They then conceptualized community-centered AI auditing tools grounded in Hawaiian cultural values, such as tracing the genealogy of knowledge sources.
Educators in Hawai'i envision AI auditing tools that trace the genealogy of knowledge, highlighting the need for community-centered approaches to address cultural misrepresentation in AI.
Although generative AI is being deployed into classrooms with promises of aiding teachers, educators caution that these tools can have unintended pedagogical repercussions, including cultural misrepresentation and bias. These concerns are heightened in low-resource language and Indigenous education settings, where AI systems frequently underperform. We investigate these challenges in Hawai`i, where public schools operate under a statewide mandate to integrate Hawaiian language and culture into education. Through four co-design workshops with 22 public school educators, we surfaced concerns about using generative AI in educational settings, particularly around cultural misrepresentation, and corresponding designs for auditing tools that address these issues. We find that educators envision tools grounded in specific Hawaiian cultural values and practices, such as tracing the genealogy of knowledge in source materials. Building on these insights, we conceptualize AI auditing as a community-oriented process rather than the work of isolated individuals, and discuss implications for designing auditing tools.
Stanford HAI