Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper benchmarks five cooperative localization (CL) algorithms—CCL, DCL, StCL, CI, and Standard-CL—in featureless, GPS-denied environments using Monte Carlo simulations under weak data association and robust detection conditions. The study reveals that StCL and Standard-CL achieve the lowest position errors but suffer from filter inconsistency, while DCL exhibits stability due to its measurement stride mechanism. Covariance Intersection (CI) is identified as the most balanced approach, offering near-optimal consistency and competitive accuracy.
Covariance Intersection (CI) strikes the best balance between accuracy and consistency in cooperative localization, outperforming other methods in featureless environments.
Cooperative localization (CL) enables accurate position estimation in multi-robot systems operating in GPS-denied environments. This paper presents a comparative study of five CL approaches: Centralized Cooperative Localization (CCL), Decentralized Cooperative Localization (DCL), Sequential Cooperative Localization (StCL), Covariance Intersection (CI), and Standard Cooperative Localization (Standard-CL). All methods are implemented in ROS and evaluated through Monte Carlo simulations under two conditions: weak data association and robust detection. Our analysis reveals fundamental trade-offs among the methods. StCL and Standard-CL achieve the lowest position errors but exhibit severe filter inconsistency, making them unsuitable for safety-critical applications. DCL demonstrates remarkable stability under challenging conditions due to its measurement stride mechanism, which provides implicit regularization against outliers. CI emerges as the most balanced approach, achieving near-optimal consistency while maintaining competitive accuracy. CCL provides theoretically optimal estimation but shows sensitivity to measurement outliers. These findings offer practical guidance for selecting CL algorithms based on application requirements.
