Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a novel approach to recipe similarity estimation by fusing semantic, lexical, and domain-specific (nutritional) information. The method analyzes ingredients, preparation methods, and nutritional attributes, then combines these similarity scores. Expert validation on 318 recipe pairs revealed 80% agreement, allowing the researchers to estimate the relative influence of each similarity aspect on expert decision-making.
Forget relying on just ingredients: this method shows how fusing semantic, lexical, and nutritional aspects significantly improves recipe similarity estimation, aligning more closely with expert judgment.
This research focuses on developing advanced methods for assessing similarity between recipes by combining different sources of information and analytical approaches. We explore the semantic, lexical, and domain similarity of food recipes, evaluated through the analysis of ingredients, preparation methods, and nutritional attributes. A web-based interface was developed to allow domain experts to validate the combined similarity results. After evaluating 318 recipe pairs, experts agreed on 255 (80%). The evaluation of expert assessments enables the estimation of which similarity aspects--lexical, semantic, or nutritional--are most influential in expert decision-making. The application of these methods has broad implications in the food industry and supports the development of personalized diets, nutrition recommendations, and automated recipe generation systems.
