Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a pipeline leveraging GPT-4o mini and an Extended Scenic DSL to automatically generate simulation-ready autonomous driving scenarios from real-world crash reports. The key innovation lies in the use of the Scenic DSL as an intermediate representation, separating high-level semantic understanding from low-level scenario rendering, thereby improving accuracy and capturing real-world variability compared to direct text-to-scenario methods. Experiments using NHTSA CIREN data and the CARLA simulator demonstrate high accuracy in knowledge extraction and successful triggering of intended traffic-rule violations.
GPT-4o mini, paired with a Scenic DSL, can automatically translate real-world crash reports into verifiable autonomous driving simulation scenarios with near-perfect accuracy.
Real-world crash reports, which combine textual summaries and sketches, are valuable for scenario-based testing of autonomous driving systems (ADS). However, current methods cannot effectively translate this multimodal data into precise, executable simulation scenarios, hindering the scalability of ADS safety validation. In this work, we propose a scalable and verifiable pipeline that uses a large language model (GPT-4o mini) and a probabilistic intermediate representation (an Extended Scenic domain-specific language) to automatically extract semantic scenario configurations from crash reports and generate corresponding simulation-ready scenarios. Unlike earlier approaches such as ScenicNL and LCTGen (which generate scenarios directly from text) or TARGET (which uses deterministic mappings from traffic rules), our method introduces an intermediate Scenic DSL layer to separate high-level semantic understanding from low-level scenario rendering, reducing errors and capturing real-world variability. We evaluated the pipeline on cases from the NHTSA CIREN database. The results show high accuracy in knowledge extraction: 100% correctness for environmental and road network attributes, and 97% and 98% for oracle and actor trajectories, respectively, compared to human-derived ground truth. We executed the generated scenarios in the CARLA simulator using the Autoware driving stack, and they consistently triggered the intended traffic-rule violations (such as opposite-lane crossing and red-light running) across 2,000 scenario variations. These findings demonstrate that the proposed pipeline provides a legally grounded, scalable, and verifiable approach to ADS safety validation.
