Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of various robotic controller interfaces for interventional neuroradiology by having ten interventional neuroradiologists navigate a sensorized neurovascular phantom using manual, joystick, and haptic feedback modalities. Results indicated that manual navigation was significantly faster than all robotic modalities, while joystick control led to a higher incidence of catheter prolapse events. Despite all methods being deemed safe in terms of vessel-wall force, operator experience played a crucial role, with experts outperforming novices across all metrics, particularly when haptic feedback was utilized.
Manual navigation outperforms robotic controllers in speed and safety, raising questions about the efficacy of haptic feedback in complex procedures.
Objective: To evaluate robotic controller interfaces for interventional neuroradiology procedures in-vitro incorporating a force-sensing platform to assess safety. Methods: A custom endovascular robot, device-mimicking controller, and sensorized neurovascular phantom were developed. Ten interventional neuroradiologists (4 novices, 6 experts) performed simulated navigations using four control modalities: device-mimicking controllers with and without haptic feedback, joystick-based input, and manual navigation. Navigation time, peak vessel-wall forces, incorrect catheterisations, and prolapse events were assessed, alongside user analyses. Results: Manual navigation was fastest (mean 47.7 s) compared to haptic-on (248.7 s), haptic-off (314.7 s), and joystick (392.6 s) modalities (p<0.001). Regardless of controller type, vessel-wall forces were below the 0.70 N puncture threshold; therefore all modalities were considered safe. Joystick produced significantly more prolapse events than manual control (1.56 vs 0.13; p=0.018). Operator experience was relevant to performance: experts made fewer incorrect catheterisations than novices (0.25 vs 0.62; p=0.035) and applied less vessel-wall force (p<0.0005); these effects were sustained across controllers but accentuated when haptics were on. Users perceived haptic on and haptic off as similarly intuitive, and more intuitive than joystick (p=0.033). Conclusion: Device-mimicking robotic controllers outperform joystick interfaces on most metrics; haptic feedback shows promising but non-significant performance benefits.
