Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces ProVisE, a benchmark-agnostic framework designed to evaluate spatial cognition in image-generation models through protocol-constrained visual answers rather than traditional text-based metrics. By creating SpatialGen-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark with 470 samples across various spatial subtasks, the authors demonstrate that image-generation models can perform competitively when spatial answers are expressed in pixel space, while text-output VLMs excel in compositional reasoning. These results highlight the distinct advantages of pixel-space expression and text-based reasoning, providing a new testbed for spatial cognition research in AI.
Image-generation models can outperform text-output VLMs in spatial tasks when evaluated through visual answers, revealing a critical shift in how we assess spatial intelligence in AI.
Spatial intelligence is essential for agents to move from static semantic understanding toward interacting with the physical world. Many spatial tasks are grounded in continuous visual scenes, where locations, regions, and paths are more naturally expressed by pointing, marking, or drawing than by reporting precise coordinates or discrete textual symbols. Yet existing spatial reasoning benchmarks usually require coordinates, options, or text, creating an answer-interface mismatch for image-generation models. This makes it difficult to evaluate image-generation models under the same task semantics as text-output VLMs, despite their ability to externalize spatial judgments directly in pixel space. We propose ProVisE (Protocolized Visual Evaluation), a benchmark-agnostic framework that elicits protocol-constrained visual answers from image-generation models and parses them into structured predictions compatible with original metrics. ProVisE also includes an Agentic builder that constructs and validates task-specific protocols for new benchmarks. We further introduce SpatialGen-Bench, a curated diagnostic benchmark of 470 samples across 14 spatial subtasks, four capability levels, and diverse answer forms. We evaluate representative text-output VLMs and image-generation models in a unified setting and validate Agentic protocol construction on six external spatial benchmarks. Results show that image-generation models are competitive when spatial answers can be externalized directly in pixel space, while text-output VLMs retain a clear advantage in compositional spatial reasoning. These findings reveal complementary strengths of pixel-space expression and text-based reasoning and establish a metric-compatible testbed for studying spatial cognition in image-generation models.