Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces DaEdiTikZ, a novel large-scale dataset derived from scientific revision trajectories, which enables the training of models for editing scientific figures. By leveraging 391K TikZ edit pairs mined from platforms like arXiv and GitHub, the authors construct a framework that allows for iterative refinement of figures, addressing a critical gap in existing methodologies that rely on costly systems or synthetic edits. The resulting EdiTikZ models outperform existing baselines in both automatic and human evaluations, demonstrating their effectiveness in producing high-quality, publication-ready figures.
EdiTikZ models achieve superior performance in scientific figure editing, outperforming GPT-5.6-Sol and matching Gemini-3.1-Pro, even under challenging conditions.
Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown strong performance in generating scientific figures from text or images. However, producing publication-ready figures requires iterative refinement, making scientific figure editing an important yet largely unexplored task. Existing approaches rely on costly proprietary agentic systems, focus primarily on evaluation, or construct training supervision from synthetically generated edits. Instead, we leverage naturally occurring scientific revision and development trajectories as a scalable source of supervision. To this end, we introduce DaEdiTikZ, the first large-scale dataset of revision-derived scientific figure edits, constructed by mining 391K plausible TikZ edit pairs from arXiv, GitHub, and TeX SE and inferring 781K directed edit instructions with a VLM conditioned on rendered figures and TikZ code. We further introduce DaEdiTikZ-Bench, a human-refined benchmark with 790 instances, and train two compact Qwen3.5-based EdiTikZ models (4B and 9B) by jointly learning reconstruction and editing, followed by reinforcement learning (RL) with complementary rewards for rendered fidelity and edit application. Automatic evaluation places our 9B model above all tested baselines, while human evaluation with 9 annotators and 4,320 ratings places it above GPT-5.6-Sol and on par with Gemini-3.1-Pro. Under severe out-of-distribution shifts, it remains competitive with GPT-5.6-Sol near its 2K training sequence-length regime. Models and datasets will be released.