Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper conducts a comparative analysis of generative AI policies from higher education institutions and their implementation in computer science courses, highlighting the significant impact of GenAI on student learning. The research reveals a disparity where institutional guidelines are generally supportive of GenAI use, while course-level adoption remains cautious among instructors. By proposing an instructor-centered framework, the study aims to facilitate more effective integration of GenAI in computing education.
Institutional support for generative AI in education is high, but classroom adoption remains surprisingly cautious, revealing a critical gap in implementation.
With the increased use of generative AI (GenAI) applications such as ChatGPT, higher education institutions (HEIs) have released a range of guidelines and policies to direct adoption within their institutions. In computer science (CS) courses GenAI adoption is especially high and the implications for student learning are significant. At the same time, instructors have also been forced to address the use of GenAI as students have started to use it for a range of functions. Currently, comparative analysis of guidance provided by institutions and its uptake in instruction is lacking. In this paper we bridge this gap by comparing institutional and computing course level guidance to better understand this terrain. We utilize secondary analysis of institutional and course syllabi guidelines from higher education institutions in the U.S. classified as research-intensive. Our findings reveal that although institutional guidance is more pro-use, at the course-level the uptake is still guarded. We discuss the implications and propose an instructor-centered framework to guide future adoption of GenAI.