Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces MinkUNeXt-VINE++, a novel method that integrates early fusion of heterogeneous LiDAR data from Livox Mid-360 and Velodyne VLP-16 sensors, coupled with a learned re-ranking strategy to enhance place recognition in unstructured environments. The approach effectively combines the unique strengths of both sensors, addressing the challenges of repetitive environments like vineyards, where identifying true positives is difficult. Experimental results on the TEMPO-VINE dataset reveal a significant 20% improvement in the Recall@1 metric over single-sensor methods, with an additional 30% gain when incorporating re-ranking.
Achieving a 20% boost in place recognition accuracy through innovative sensor fusion and learned re-ranking could redefine localization strategies in challenging environments.
Robust localization in unstructured environments, such as agricultural fields, is a critical challenge for autonomous systems. LiDAR sensors provide detailed 3D information about the environment and are invariant to lighting conditions. For this reason, LiDAR-based place recognition methods have gained significant attention. In this paper, we propose MinkUNeXt-VINE++, a novel approach that combines early fusion of heterogeneous LiDAR data from two sensors (Livox Mid-360 and Velodyne VLP-16) and a learned re-ranking strategy in inference time. This fusion leverages the strengths of each sensor to provide a more comprehensive representation of the environment. Additionally, the re-ranking approach is particularly important in repetitive environments, such as vineyards, as finding true positives is a major challenge. We evaluated our approach using the TEMPO-VINE dataset, which provides heterogeneous LiDAR data in vineyard environments across different phenological stages. Our results demonstrate that MinkUNeXt-VINE++ significantly improves place recognition performance compared to single-sensor approaches and state-of-the-art methods. MinkUNeXt-VINE++ achieves a 20% improvement in the Recall@1 metric compared to single-sensor approaches, and +30% including re-ranking. The code of our method is publicly available for reproduction.