Track manipulation, locomotion and embodied systems.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
FinAutoRubric automates the synthesis and verification of query-specific evaluation rubrics for financial research agents by coupling reusable expert criteria and programmatic rules with multi-agent research-and-review loops. Scaling domain-specific agent evaluation has traditionally been bottlenecked by the prohibitive cost of manual rubric curation and the need to pin ground-truth factual values to precise information cutoffs. Evaluated across three expert finance benchmarks, the system generates rubrics that match human grading fidelity, cover more ground-truth values than existing rubric generators, and are preferred by professional financial analysts in blind evaluations.
Domain-specific agent evaluation no longer requires manual ground-truth curation: autonomous research and verification loops constrained by reusable expert rules yield grading rubrics that professional analysts prefer over expert baselines.
Evaluating finance research agents requires rubrics that reflect expert standards and fix the values correct as of an information cutoff. Expert-reviewed finance benchmarks rely on fixed, per-item rubrics, which are costly to extend and cannot encode each institution's own standard. In FinAutoRubric, experts specify reusable evaluation guidance, while agents and code carry out query-specific rubric generation, review, and validation. This expert guidance governs every agent, as prompts and as rules that code enforces, and a Task Bank of reusable criteria carries it across tasks. In long-horizon loops that follow the expert guidance, a writer agent researches every expected value and a reviewer agent verifies it, and failures escalate to a human. On three expert-authored finance benchmarks, its rubrics track expert scoring as closely as the strongest evaluated generator while stating the expert rubric's expected value for more criteria, their scores agree with human grading, and in-house analysts prefer them in a blind review. The released 100-query FinAutoRubric Benchmark, built from in-house analysts' key questions across 78 tasks and eight asset classes, shows that rubrics from an earlier model generation still leave headroom for a later one.
Google Research