Track manipulation, locomotion and embodied systems.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
RESETTLE addresses robotic manipulation recovery by triggering corrective actions when independent action proposals disagree, retrieving a demonstration via V-JEPA, and applying a state-servo prior with a guarded visual residual. This model-agnostic framework achieves significant success rate gains across multiple simulated and real-world benchmarks, outperforming latency-intensive vision-language reasoning and online optimization methods. RESETTLE demonstrates substantial computational efficiency, reducing recovery latency by up to 93.57% compared to existing approaches.
Robotic recovery is now 74-93% faster by triggering corrections from action proposal disagreement and using efficient visual residuals, not slow VLM reasoning.
Reliable robotic manipulation requires timely intervention to correct emerging deviations and restore progress after execution errors. However, recovery methods based on repeated vision-language reasoning or iterative online optimization can incur substantial latency, delaying intervention. To address these challenges, we introduce RESETTLE(Robotic rEcovery through diSagrEement-Triggered reTrievaL and Efficient Corrective Control), a model-agnostic framework that provides computationally efficient recovery at the action-execution interface of frozen robot policies. RESETTLE triggers recovery when two action proposals independently sampled under identical conditioning persistently disagree. It retrieves a same-task demonstration reference using an adapted V-JEPA encoder and combines a state-servo prior with a guarded visual residual to execute one corrective action without online trajectory optimization or additional vision-language reasoning, then returns control to the base policy. Across six base policies in simulation, RESETTLE achieves up to 8.70%, 6.28%, and 6.83% absolute success-rate gains on LIBERO-Plus, Meta-World, and RoboCasa Tabletop, respectively, with further improvements on four real-world tasks using two policies. In QwenPI-based comparisons, its monitoring-and-recovery computation latency is 74.04%--93.57% lower than VoLoAgent's monitoring-and-planning latency for grasp and place tool calls. It also raises Harness VLA's LIBERO-Pro Swap success from 42% to 50%, demonstrating compatibility with high-level agentic planning. Code available at: https://github.com/JIA-Lab-research/RESETTLE