Track manipulation, locomotion and embodied systems.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper designs a token economy for highway lane allocation, balancing fairness and efficiency by allowing users to earn and spend non-monetary tokens for express lane access. Using a finite-population dynamic congestion game with evolutionary policy revisions and a mean-field approximation, they derive token prices that achieve system-optimal lane splits and temporal fairness. Microscopic simulations with real-world data demonstrate that this token-based approach nearly matches the efficiency of unreserved lanes while significantly improving fairness by reducing urgency-weighted perceived travel time.
Non-monetary tokens can achieve highway congestion management as efficient as free access while dramatically improving fairness.
We study the design of a token economy for highway lane allocation that aims to improve fairness without sacrificing traffic efficiency. Motivated by the San Mateo 101 Express Lanes Project, we consider a setting in which high-occupancy vehicles have unrestricted access to an express lane, while the remaining users can alternate between regular and express lanes by earning and spending nonmonetary tokens. We model the resulting interaction as a finite-population dynamic congestion game with heterogeneous time preferences and limited-information evolutionary policy revisions. Building on a mean-field approximation, we derive token prices that enforce the system-optimal lane split while inducing fairness over time through turn-taking. The scheme is evaluated in a microscopic traffic simulation with real-world demand data. The results show that the proposed prices yield nearly the same average travel time as a baseline scenario in which no lane is reserved as an express lane, while substantially reducing urgency-weighted perceived travel time. These findings highlight token economies as a promising alternative to monetary congestion pricing for fairer management of scarce road capacity.