Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a novel distributed architecture for agentic UAV swarms that manages context and communication by employing an event-driven reason-act-observe lifecycle with structured atomic notes organized into core, local, and peer-specific memory. An interest-aware gossip engine selectively disseminates these notes based on semantic novelty and recency, mitigating the context degradation and overhead issues inherent in fully distributed SLM control. Experimental results in a simulated search-and-rescue mission demonstrate that this approach significantly improves mission completion rates and reduces inference-token consumption and data transmission compared to unrestricted flooding and SLM-delegated forwarding.
Agentic UAV swarms can now complete complex missions with half the inference cost and vastly improved reliability by intelligently gossiping structured memory notes, outperforming both naive flooding and LLM-controlled communication.
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarms increasingly rely on language-model agents to provide adaptive mission-level reasoning in uncertain environments. Fully distributed control, in which each UAV hosts an independent Small Language Model (SLM), removes reliance on a centralized coordinator but introduces an information-management problem: long-running interaction histories can degrade the reasoning context, while indiscriminate information dissemination increases communication and inference overhead. We address these challenges with a distributed UAV-agent architecture that enables continuous local SLM control through an event-driven reason-act-observe lifecycle. Runtime knowledge is represented as structured atomic notes and organized into core, local, and peer-specific memory. A deterministic interest-aware gossip engine selectively disseminates these notes according to recipient-specific semantic novelty and recency. We evaluate the architecture using ten UAVs in a simulated search-and-rescue mission. Our approach completes all experimental runs, whereas unrestricted flooding messages completes only 70-85\%, and delegating forwarding decisions to the SLM prevents mission completion in every run. Compared with unrestricted flooding, our approach approximately halves inference-token consumption, reduces transmitted data, and achieves lower survivor-count error.