Track manipulation, locomotion and embodied systems.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
Chunk-based robot policies typically discard predicted action tails to balance reactivity against execution horizon length, but existing adaptive horizon approaches require architecture-specific probing or compute-heavy extra sampling. To resolve this, Action Upcycling dynamically extends execution horizons by upcycling discarded action trajectories whose velocity profiles remain smooth. Across diverse simulated and real-world manipulation setups spanning Vision-Language-Action and World Action Models, the method cuts inference frequency by 1.2–1.7× with zero degradation in task success rates.
Discarded tail actions in chunked robot policies remain faithful to counterfactual replans until action velocity fluctuates, allowing policies to safely extend execution horizons and slash inference calls by up to 1.7× at zero extra cost.
Modern robot policies predict a chunk of future actions from a single observation, execute only a prefix, and discard the rest before replanning. Choosing the length of this prefix, the execution horizon, poses a trade-off between reactivity and efficiency. A short horizon keeps the policy reactive to the environment, but requires frequent policy calls. Recent test-time methods adaptively select the horizon for each chunk, but they either read model internals, where the signal must be chosen for each architecture, or draw extra samples, which adds cost. We propose *Action Upcycling*, a training-free algorithm that reuses actions the policy would otherwise discard, without accessing model internals or drawing extra samples. We find that discarded actions stay close to their replanned versions as long as the action velocity remains smooth. Action Upcycling therefore extends the execution horizon up to the point where the velocity begins to fluctuate. Extensive experiments on simulated and real-world manipulation tasks show that Action Upcycling reduces policy calls by 1.2--1.7$\times$ with no loss in success rate, across multiple Vision-Language-Action Models (VLAs) and even a World Action Model (WAM). It applies to any chunked policy at negligible cost and is orthogonal to other policy acceleration methods such as few-step sampling and streaming action decoding, opening a new axis for policy acceleration.