Track manipulation, locomotion and embodied systems.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This survey evaluates planetary robotics simulators for perception and autonomy across four critical axes: openness, platform diversity, sensor modeling, and operational fidelity. High-fidelity simulation is essential for training and validating off-world autonomy where physical field testing is cost-prohibitive, hazardous, and largely unrepeatable. The authors find that while modern tools achieve strong visual and physics rendering, the ecosystem remains severely fragmented by rover-centric platform bias, low open-source availability, and a failure to model mission-critical constraints like onboard compute, energy, and communications.
Planetary autonomy simulators have mastered visual and physics rendering, yet routinely ignore the onboard compute, power, and bandwidth constraints that actually cause real-world missions to fail.
Planetary robotics is an important enabler of scientific exploration in environments where direct human-in-the-loop operation is costly, hazardous, or infeasible. However, developing and validating planetary robotic systems remains difficult because representative field testing is expensive, limited, and often unrepeatable under mission-relevant conditions. In this setting, simulation serves as a central tool for perception and autonomy research, synthetic data generation, system integration, and pre-deployment evaluation. Despite its importance, the literature on planetary robotics simulation remains dispersed across different simulation engines, implementations, and application settings. This paper surveys simulation works for planetary robotic perception and autonomy across four practical axes: Openness and Availability, Scenario and Platform Coverage, Sensor and Perception Support, and Environmental and Operational Realism. The surveyed simulation works report visual or physical fidelity and support perception-oriented workflows. They also indicate uneven public availability, rover-centered coverage, partial support for specialized sensing modalities, and uneven reporting of operational constraints such as onboard computation, energy, and communication restrictions.