Track the frontier, from condensed matter to cosmology.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces AM-Bench, a comprehensive modular simulation suite designed for benchmarking aerial manipulation (AM) policy learning, addressing the unique challenges posed by aerial dynamics. By incorporating various robot embodiments and a wide range of tasks, AM-Bench allows for a nuanced evaluation of how different factors—such as control strategies and environmental disturbances—interact to influence task performance. The authors validate the effectiveness of AM-Bench through multiple simulation studies and real-world hardware tests, demonstrating its potential to advance research in aerial manipulation systems significantly.
Aerial manipulation systems reveal that traditional benchmarks fall short, with AM-Bench enabling a deeper understanding of how embodiment and control strategies impact performance in dynamic environments.
Standardized benchmarks have played a central role in advancing robot manipulation learning, yet most focus on ground-supported manipulation systems, which limits their applicability to dynamics-critical domains such as aerial manipulation (AM). AM presents distinct system-level challenges, including environmental disturbances, coupled dynamics between the manipulator and floating base, and constrained degrees of freedom. Consequently, task performance depends jointly on robot embodiment, low-level control, and high-level policy design. We introduce AM-Bench, a modular simulation suite and benchmark for multirotor-based AM policy learning. AM-Bench includes representative embodiments spanning underactuated, fully actuated, and overactuated systems, 12 tasks across contact, transport, and constrained interaction, configurable aerodynamic disturbances and actuator saturation, standard low-level controllers, and baseline policy-learning algorithms. Unlike prior manipulation benchmarks that primarily emphasize end-to-end policy performance, AM-Bench enables system-level evaluation of how embodiment, control, disturbances, and policy choices interact. We demonstrate its diagnostic value through three simulation studies spanning high-level policies, policy--control interfaces, and embodiments, together with real-world validation of modeled effects and a hardware test of the learning pipeline.
CMU ML