Track the frontier, from condensed matter to cosmology.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a framework for evaluating proactive risk awareness in LLMs, focusing on their ability to anticipate unintended ecological consequences from seemingly benign queries. The authors construct the "Butterfly" dataset, comprising 1,094 queries designed to elicit responses with potential latent ecological impacts. Experiments on five LLMs reveal significant declines in proactive risk awareness under length restrictions, cross-lingual consistency in failures, and persistent blind spots in species protection, highlighting a gap in current safety alignment.
LLMs often fail to anticipate ecological risks arising from seemingly harmless queries, revealing a critical blind spot in their safety alignment.
As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in everyday decision-making, their safety responsibilities extend beyond reacting to explicit harmful intent toward anticipating unintended but consequential risks. In this work, we introduce a proactive risk awareness evaluation framework that measures whether LLMs can anticipate potential harms and provide warnings before damage occurs. We construct the Butterfly dataset to instantiate this framework in the environmental and ecological domain. It contains 1,094 queries that simulate ordinary solution-seeking activities whose responses may induce latent ecological impact. Through experiments across five widely used LLMs, we analyze the effects of response length, languages, and modality. Experimental results reveal consistent, significant declines in proactive awareness under length-restricted responses, cross-lingual similarities, and persistent blind spots in (multimodal) species protection. These findings highlight a critical gap between current safety alignment and the requirements of real-world ecological responsibility, underscoring the need for proactive safeguards in LLM deployment.