Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The authors calculate the non-interacting density-density response function, directional Drude weights, and plasmon dispersions for gapless and gapped three-dimensional nodal-ring semimetals under in-plane and axial tilts. Mapping collective charge excitations in these systems is essential for determining how topological band geometry governs directional plasmon propagation and screening in quantum materials. They show that in-plane tilting generates a partially gapped Fermi surface with fractional-power corrections to plasmon frequencies, while axial tilting yields a double-valued Fermi surface that drives significant optical anisotropy.
Tilting the Dirac spectrum of 3D nodal-ring semimetals fundamentally alters collective excitations, unlocking fractional-power plasmon frequency scaling and strong optical anisotropy through partially gapped Fermi surfaces.
We study plasmon modes in three-dimensional nodal-ring semimetals, considering both the gapless $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric nodal ring (PTNR) and its gapped counterpart (GNR). Working in the low-doping regime where the linearised Hamiltonian is valid, we compute the non-interacting density-density response function, the Drude weight, and the plasmon dispersion within the random-phase approximation. We treat the untilted configuration as well as in-plane tilt along $k_x$ and axial tilt along $k_z$. For the in-plane tilted GNR, a strong-enough tilt or a small enough chemical potential pushes part of the ring into a partially-gapped regime. Only part of the Fermi surface survives there. We obtain closed-form results for this regime in two limits: a small tilt and a small gap. The small-gap limit produces a fractional-power correction to the Drude weight and the plasmon frequency. For the axially-tilted GNR, the partially-gapped window has a double-valued local Fermi surface for which we obtain the density-of-states and the Drude weights in closed forms. We analyse how the tilt and the mass-gap affect the plasmon dispersion and the anisotropy between axial and in-plane directions. Our results provide a systematic comparison between the gapless and gapped cases and between different tilt directions.